The International Conference on AI-Driven Education (AIDE 2027) conference submissions are subject to a double-blind peer review process conducted by experts who are members of the conference’s Technical Committee. These reviewers specialize in fields specifically aligned with the conference topics.

Technical Committee members provide the vital link with the academic and professional community that contributes to the conference’s success. Reviews assist the Program Committee in selecting high-quality papers and offer constructive feedback to authors to strengthen their work. Your insights may also help Program Chairs identify outstanding papers for special recognition.

Criteria for Being a Reviewer

• Holding a doctorate in the relevant field
• Established expertise in the field
• Strong publication record in high-impact, peer-reviewed journals
• Broad knowledge of relevant sub-fields
• Previous experience in peer reviewing or editorial boards
• Proficiency in academic writing and grammar

Benefits for Being a Reviewer

• Listing as a Technical Committee member on the official website and in the conference proceedings
• Eligibility for a special discount on the registration fee
• Electronic certificate of reviewership
• Stay up to date with current research in your field
• Opportunities to develop academic and critical thinking skills
• Enhance your CV for promotion and/or tenure

Review Ethics

Authors expect to receive detailed comments and suggestions from reviewers that help improve their work. Please always provide impartial and constructive feedback with reasonable suggestions and a professional tone.

If any conflict of interest is detected, it should be promptly disclosed to the editor. Avoid suggesting the addition of irrelevant or unnecessary references. If you discover any suspected ethical issues during the review process, please notify the editor immediately.

Keep all intellectual contents of the submissions and documents confidential. Manuscripts should not be viewed by anyone other than the assigned reviewer. Any content obtained during peer review must not be used for personal research purposes.

Allocate enough time to complete the review before the deadline. If you are unable to meet the deadline, inform the editors as early as possible.

Stay available for communication in case of any special circumstances, and respond to the editor in a timely manner.

Review Report

A formal review report should include an overall recommendation followed by detailed comments addressing specific questions and suggestions. This will help authors improve their work and assist the editor in making a final decision.

Feedback should be specific to particular sentences or paragraphs. Write comments clearly and only in English, as authors may speak different languages.

Authors have the right to rebut the review result, which may lead to a second round of peer review. The editor has the final authority to decide whether to initiate another review round.

Accept or Decline

Reviewers are expected to accept or decline invitations promptly, based on the manuscript title and abstract. If there is any conflict of interest or if the topic is beyond your expertise, please inform the editor as soon as possible.

How to Apply

Applications to join the committee are welcome from academics and practitioners engaged in the relevant fields. If you would like to be considered as a member of the Technical Committee or as a reviewer for submitted papers, please send your latest CV to: aide.program.committee@gmail.com